Most of these players won't even be playing in 2012. Either because they're too old and ineffective or because their team didn't qualify.
The only player on that list that is a lock for the Olympics is Gasol. These other players who have their eyes set on 2012 need to STFU and wait.
"I really like the attitudes of eagles. They never give up. When they grab a fish or something else, they never let it go. It doesn't matter. In a book, they write they find a skeleton of [an] eagle and there is no fish. It means that the fish beat him and killed him, but he didn't let go." -- Donatas Motiejunas
We are over rated because we have many players in the nba. Basically, players in the NBa => medias pro nba => supposed level of the nt
No one is checking if we have a gasol, siskau, smodis (etc) type of player.
It's less of a pain for italy and turkey, but they also have their load of disappointing competition curiously mostly since they had big names (at least here) in the nba.
Fact is that it's been several years that we lack key players in the paint (besides flo pietrus & diaw), especially since the retirement from weis & moiso. No one left to intimidate, fix the defense and provide what you expect from a "center", and that's why not having noah is such a pain (and a "local drama"). Bunch of people criticizing his lack of commitment (while not having played for any of our nt's in the past, but let's move on)
As for what he declared, blame him for being lazy and not knowing the international competition if you want, but i don't expect a player who have always been playing in the states to be able to figure out how tough the qualification process is for a european nt.
And i don't jump on the bandwaggon to blame his choice, i think chicago can offer him a decent enough contract to play in a contender (even if it will prolly take a few more pieces in the roster), and you can't ignore the situation (potential lock out + pressure from his agent/surroundings most likely).
The real scandal is that we could not train any decent tall center in the last 10 years. Worst, we found wise to burn bridges with moiso after the 2003 eurobasket. And not all our big are crackheads (=> points our scouting and prospect development)
its like that statement in the movie classic a bronx tale. france has so much talent mvblair but i think they lack the commitment to the national team. the french soccer team has done their best with their golden generation 98'world cup,2000 eurochamps,2001-2003 confederations cup,4 straight world cup appearance . now france has their golden generation in basketball and ? they dont sence the urgency of time. these guys like parker,diaw,m.pietrus,turiuf arent getting any younger. 13 NBA players!!! thats no joke. russia germany have 2 and their indespensable. italy 3 thats their best. brazil is the france of the americas. but they gt a great coach"magnano" and the commitment of the players and now they will finish top 8, guaranteed. france should look into american NBA coach, who likes to teach and get the commitment of the players and play a hybride game nba/fiba like the USA. play to your streangths.
Where is the french nowitski ? Who is the french kirilenko (ok, you could debate that diaw can bring more or less the same stuff) ?
You seriously put turiaf, MP and even parker in the same category as nowitski, kirilenko, splitter/nene/"tahiti bob" varejao or even scola/gino for argentina ?
Among the 13 players, 80% are role player (even batum). The highest rank'd being diaw (and not a lot of fans in the nba would want him in their team from reading a bunch of blogs) and parker. Turiaf, MP are rotation players basically, batum and beaubois are roleplayer for now, we will see how they develop, same deal with seraphin. As for considering ajinca, mahinmi, diawara, petro etc nba players, lol...
Get real, those are among - we have a few talented guards here and even gelabale left in europe - our best players for sure, but they are very far from being superstars (except parker, or tp + eva i should say).
And above all we don't have any pf-c of a good size & level to go along diaw/pietrus.
Last but not least, parker and turiaf have always participated in the NT since their euro gold medal in junior unless they got injured (the case for turiaf this year). Pietrus (mickael) finally decided to have surgery for his wrist this summer. Last year we had gelabale who had no contract who clearly said he would not be available for the nt because of his situation.
The only headcase being noah, but you can't really speak of a lack of commitment for a guy who never played for france in any of our NT's in the past.
We have our share of diva's, right, but the main issue is still our elite pool - number wise and talent wise, the way we train our players is highly debatable here -, no matter what you seem to think.
Last edited by raph; 08-12-2010 at 08:37 AM.
Tony Parker is that good, Raph. TP remains one of the best PGs on the planet. When he plays in the NBA, he is as good as anyone. He's also played well for the French NT...when he can.I don't know what other people think, but I'm a big Diaw fan. If he could recover the energy he had a few years ago, he'd be the French Nowitzki.Among the 13 players, 80% are role player (even batum). The highest rank'd being diaw (and not a lot of fans in the nba would want him in their team from reading a bunch of blogs) and parker.Yeah, but those are good players. They're very good. And Beaubois might be great!Turiaf, MP are rotation players basically, batum and beaubois are roleplayer for now, we will see how they develop, same deal with seraphin.I haven't seen enough of them to comment.As for considering ajinca, mahinmi, diawara, petro etc nba players, lol...True.And above all we don't have any pf-c of a good size & level to go along diaw/pietrus.Raph, you seem to be saying "France has players that look good because they're in the NBA, but really they're not good and the expectations for them are always too high." Is that what you're saying?We have our share of diva's, right, but the main issue is still our elite pool - number wise and talent wise, the way we train our players is highly debatable here -, no matter what you seem to think.
I think I would agree with that. Maybe the French players, because they're in the NBA, have very high expectations.
"I really like the attitudes of eagles. They never give up. When they grab a fish or something else, they never let it go. It doesn't matter. In a book, they write they find a skeleton of [an] eagle and there is no fish. It means that the fish beat him and killed him, but he didn't let go." -- Donatas Motiejunas
Yeppers.
As for diaw, it's hard to compare him with dirk as one is a very good defender, the other one well.. the other well is an awesome scorer![]()
I like the comparison with kirilenko as before he gained some weight (not necessary "fat free" ^^) he had a rather similar game and a big impact on his team.
Still, i also said that our main goal should be to develop a lot of EL level players at all position to fill our club rosters and some of the best european teams/leagues. Situation tends to change as we no longer seem to focus mostly on athletic profiles, but it will take a few more years to see a real change imo (i remain optimistic because of our 92/94/95 generations, but till they are in their 20ies we gonna have to rely on our nba players, whatever are their limits).