i did not say more sucessful, i said better. GMU has always been in a lighter conference while marshall is in a relatively stronger and more popular conference. for example, most if not all of the teams in the big ten conference can probably win the championships of some other minor conferences and earns an ncaa stint. but no, they don't transfer to those weaker, less popular conferences. there's more to the ncaa than earning an ncaa berth and experience "one and done"
Believe!
Emman Monfort says you may kiss his PBA draftee's ass
Sorry, I got tangled up. Kakagising langstill, I'd like to see a discussion where every assertion is backed up by concrete evidence. For example, reamily could say that Eastern Carolina is 7-16 this year. Something like that.
Anyway, I'm going down for (late) lunch. Fire away!
Believe!
Emman Monfort says you may kiss his PBA draftee's ass
GMU shocked the world partly because they were CAA members. But partly, it was also because they didn't win their conference championship and was given an at-large bid that people thought should have been given to Hofstra. The CAA has had 6 wins in the NCAA tournament, including that GMU Final Four run and the first-round Virginia Commonwealth win over Duke in 2007, with Eric Maynor leading the rams. Prior to 2006, the league had wins in 2002 and 2001. They had two teams in the NCAA tournament in 2007 (VCU and ODU), 2006 (GMU and UNC-Wilmington), and 2001 (Hofstra and Georgia State).
As for the Summit League, I'm sorry but it's been a one-bid league since 1996. Its collective record in the NCAA tournament is a measly 2-13, not counting that play-in game win by Oakland against Alabama A&M in 2005.
I have to admit, though, that the C-USA has been more competitive than either of these leagues.
Believe!
Emman Monfort says you may kiss his PBA draftee's ass
precisely.
just to clarify, i said lutz school is better and more popular regardless of its ncaa stints than gmu because it belongs to a more popular and stronger conference. it was not my intention to say that oakland or summit is better than gmu or caa.
but of course, that is not to demean the talents of norwood and williams. those guys have game, it's just that more americans are better, stronger and more athletic than them hence they were'nt able to make it to the top teams of d1.
by the way the current ranking has marshall at 87 while GMU is at 130.